Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 921 - 940
of 4,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am
Fortunately, a few states have promulgated guidance to alleviate some of these burdensome requirements as to each certificate holder. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:03 pm
A patent holder could control a market, limit competition, and raise prices for us all. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
Overview of the Regulation A+ Offering Circular for Crypto Tokens By Bart Mallon Co-Managing Partner, Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP It is generally accepted that the initial coin offering (ICO) from mid-2017 is dead and that firms raising money for their blockchain or token projects will need to do so in a way that is compliant with SEC laws and regulations. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:53 am
This lawsuit is no different, except, sadly, it involves the President of the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
Because the United States continues to enforce the ACA (as its own brief noted), there is still a case or controversy, as there was in Windsor v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:53 pm
TD Bank N.A. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:45 am
Brunetti appealed this rejection to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which found this prohibition on immoral or scandalous marks to be in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:11 pm
Companies depending upon key employees coming to the United States also have been stymied. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:53 am
, Lops v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:24 am
The FTC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:23 am
Koh's landmark FTC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:16 am
We find none of the unit holders of Felt Farms LLC complied with the contractual requirements for membership by signing a joinder agreement prior to the expiration of the ninety-day statutory period. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:38 am
Crypto Lawyers Address Tough Questions About SEC V. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
United States (1926) claimed that the Supreme Court should not treat as an important precedent the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 because everyone knew Reconstruction was a time in which Republicans were engaged in pure politics. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
United States Postal Service (Supreme Court 2019) [Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 11:46 pm
Since our client resided in Youngstown, OH, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
