Search for: "House v. House"
Results 921 - 940
of 41,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2009, 5:09 pm
In Van Arsdale v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 8:15 am
WSJ Law Blog: "How Dare You Copy Our Goose Fat Fried Potatoes" (Owner of STRIP HOUSE protests use of name STRIP STEAK and trade dress in Las Vegas). [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:37 am
Akhurst v Director of Public Prosecutions Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “University grounds and buildings were not an enclosed area for the purposes of the Vagrancy Act 1824 which referred to any dwelling house, warehouse, coach house, stable or outhouse, enclosed yard, garden or area. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:57 am
Maswaku v Westminster City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 669; [2012] WLR (D) 153 “Section 193(5) of the Housing Act 1996 did not impose any statutory obligation on the local housing authority to spell out each and every possible consequence if an eligible homeless applicant refused temporary alternative accommodation offered which the authority considered to be suitable for him.” WLR Daily, 18th May 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:19 am
Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council Court of Appeal “Where a local authority compulsorily purchased a public open space after refusing the landowner's application for housing development, the Lands Tribunal had to value the land on the basis that planning permission had been granted for the housing development. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 1:17 am
Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council (No 2) House of Lords “The requirement that a local authority which had delayed processing a right-to-buy claim should deduct from the purchase price the purchasing tenant's rent payments during the period of delay applied where the tenant's rent had been paid for him in the form of housing benefit. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:16 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit will hear arguments in the case Donald Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:15 am
R (Ahmad) v Newham London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 14; [2009] WLR (D) 78 “A local authority scheme for the allocation of social housing which accorded priority amongst applicants with ‘reasonable preference’ under s 167 of the Housing Act 1996, as amended, according to length of time on the waiting list, rather than relative need, was [...] [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:27 am
Mitchell and Another v Glasgow City Council House of Lords “Local housing authority landlords were under no duty to warn a neighbour who had received death threats from an abusive tenant that a meeting had been arranged at which he was warned that he would be evicted unless his behaviour improved, after which the abusive tenant inflicted [...] [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Attorney had charged NYCHA in a civil complaint with fraud, […] The post U.S.A. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:41 am
Official can decide twice R (Abdi) v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:49 am
The post I’MAYA KELLY v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:53 am
Survivor was not successor to secure tenancy Birmingham City Council v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:53 pm
Supreme Court decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:54 pm
From Chief Judge Beryl Howell's opinion in Plaintiff v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 1:15 pm
" Buie, 494 U.S. at 334 When the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office conducts a search of a house using the protective sweep exception, it must follow the law as set forth in Florida cases such as Rogers v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:23 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Motley filed scores of cases challenging racial discrimination in voting rights, public accommodations, and housing access.Using archival research, this Article explores the latter category–Motley’s housing docket–through the lens of Stewart v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:12 am
See Dunlop Holdings Ltd v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
Challenging the authority of a congressional subpoena is highly difficult after the Supreme Court's decision in Eastland v. [read post]
