Search for: "Hughes, Appeal of" Results 921 - 940 of 2,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
The policy was then clarified, and her appeal to the Court of Appeal ([2016] EWCA Civ 47) was dismissed on all other grounds. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 5:56 am
Here's a surprise: A Harvard history professor, Jill Lepore, hates the Tea Parties and has written a book saying so at great length, a book reviewed by Baylor history professor Thomas Kidd at Patheos.com.Professor... [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 7:52 am by Kelly Schoening Holden
   The ruling has been upheld by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and a right to appeal was denied by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:28 am by Matrix Law
On Wednesday 8 February 2023 the Court will hand down judgments in the following appeals: In the matter of an application by Clifford Peeples for Judicial Review) (Northern Ireland) and In the matter of an application by James Hugh Allister and others for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2023] UKSC 5. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:21 pm
Rogow, P.A.; Judge Gerald Bard Tjoflat, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit; Hugh F. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 7:48 am by Ceri Morgan, Olswang LLP
Appeal to the Supreme Court The insurers appealed to the Supreme Court on the basis of Article 27, and there was a 2-day hearing before Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hughes on 8 and 9 July 2013. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
  The Technical Board of Appeal has issued its decision T 1808/13. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm
While you were sleepingPatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes covers the latest instalment of the dispute over the CRISPR gene-editing patent (T 844/18). [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 3:09 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Bryan Hughes on the Texas Public Radio show The Source about yesterday's hearing and location tracking issues generally. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 4:56 am by David DePaolo
"But the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed Hughes last May, saying Polanco was not "disabled" until after he was fired, so based on the plain language exception found in Section 3600(a)(l0)(D) his claim could not be summarily dismissed.The exception in Section 3600(a)(l0)(D) is, "The date of injury, as specified in Section 5412, is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 11:52 am
No "your secondary e-mail address has been contacted," no secret question.Among the emails in Palin's account were several from .gov addresses belonging to her aides, including a draft letter to California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, a discussion of nominations to the state court of appeals, and several bearing "DPS", the acronym for the Alaska Department of Public Safety.Alaska Department of Public Safety supervises the Alaska state troopers. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:18 am by Meg Martin
Hughes, Hughes Law Office, Sundance, Wyoming.Facts/Discussion: Elk Horn Ranch, Inc. appealed the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of its petition for review of a decision by the Crook County Board of Commissioners (Board.)The single issue is whether the district court erred in dismissing the petition for review. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 5:31 am by INFORRM
The top 10 posts of 2016 were as follows (in descending order) Case Law: PJS v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal grants privacy injunction – Sara Mansoori and Aidan Wills How to avoid defamation – Steven Price News: Daily Mail loses Human Rights Act challenge to CFA success fees and insurance premiums Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Media and Information Cases before the Appellate and European Courts in 2016… [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:18 am
This was not accepted by Lord Justice Hughes in the Court of Appeal, who found that: "For my part, one would have thought that "probably true" seems incapable of meaning anything less than that the allegation is proved on the balance of probabilities. [read post]