Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Matter"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,187
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Court (In re Gonzales), 2010 U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Jury Finds Asbestos Air Monitoring Company and Employees Guilty of Clean Air Act and Fraud Violations. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Jury Finds Asbestos Air Monitoring Company and Employees Guilty of Clean Air Act and Fraud Violations. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Jury Finds Asbestos Air Monitoring Company and Employees Guilty of Clean Air Act and Fraud Violations. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:56 pm
Div. 1997) (quoting In re Presentment of Bergen Cnty Grand Jury, 193 N.J. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:47 am
Because there are no juries, there is little of the “grand-standing” that high-profile trial lawyers can become known for. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 7:54 am
But he thinks other judges must follow the law no matter what. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 8:29 am
We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Katz, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Palo Alto, CA Right now we’re in a complete mess; nobody knows what the law is. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoenas 89-3 & 89-4, 902 F.2d 244 (U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 8:09 pm
He has 21 days to respond.The civil-rights probe is unrelated to a separate abuse-of-power criminal investigation against the Sheriff's Office by the Justice Department, which is connected to long-running disputes with county government and the judiciary and has led to months of grand-jury testimony.Attorneys for the Sheriff's Office repeatedly have said they were cooperating with the civil-rights probe but set conditions on the breadth of documents they would… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:21 am
"You don't want me on your jury.I should probably know better, but deep in my noodle is the belief that if the cops pick you up, the grand jury indicts you, the prosecutor builds a case and you wind up in court, you were probably up to something.Introduce some scientist with a bulging forehead to testify that - after parsing evidence with magnifier and isotope - you were definitely up to something, and I'm about ready to vote.Morons like me fill jury boxes… [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:06 am
And as a matter of principle, I don’t think that the courts should go very far in forcing their opinion of what’s proper on the people they’re supposed to be serving. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
IN RE MATTER OF D. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:18 am
Capatain Kidd, the notorious Scottish pirate (or privateer—take your pick), was brought before a grand jury of seventeen at the Admiralty Sessions at the Old Baily on the 8th and 9th of May in 1701. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Q: to what extent should the amount used matter? [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
As this Press Release explains, O’Dwyer “was charged in a one-count indictment today by a federal Grand Jury with e-mailing threatening communications” to a federal judge. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
If a person is charged by the grand jury with Aggravated Murder and also charged by the grand jury with a death specification (something that makes Aggravated Murder especially bad), that person is eligible for death. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm
I don't know about you, but I find it's difficult to attend all the good panels going on at conferences such as SEALS, where there are simultaneous panels competing for one's attention, not to mention the temptations of the informal schmoozing, and yes, the surroundings. [read post]
