Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2010, 11:55 am
You’re not like this guy. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:46 am
Briefly: Orin Kerr of the Volokh Conspiracy discusses a recently filed petition for certiorari in Pineda-Moreno v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) The DC Circuit has just noted on its docket that it has denied rehearing in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:32 pm
(Orin Kerr) Adam Liptak has a somewhat puzzling critique of Supreme Court opinions in the New York Times. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
We're not going to be that picky, since we want the money; but we of course reserve the right to bounce ads that sufficiently annoy us, whether esthetically (e.g., if they seem likely to be too garish on the page) or as to their content. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:45 pm
Only if they’re cute. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:05 pm
All things being equal, you’re more likely to answer a poll if you know what it’s talking about than if you don’t. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
We’re a news operation. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:32 am
(Orin Kerr) In no particular order: 1. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:51 am
It thus struck me, when a mind as sharp as Orin Kerr's offered a CLE at Volokh Conspiracy, that it commanded attention. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:11 pm
(Orin Kerr) This past summer, I was elected to serve on the Steering Committee of the Criminal Law and Individual Rights Section of the District of Columbia Bar. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am
Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr and Sir John Dyson SCJ agree with the reasons given by both Lord Hope and Lord Rodger. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 8:21 pm
Feel free to drop in and buy me a beer say hello whether you’re on the market, you’re a faculty member on an appointments committee, or you’re a VC reader in town. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:14 am
I’m considering what kind of world we’re leaving for our children. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) I appreciate Jonathan Adler’s response on the nature of Randy Barnett’s proposed act/omission distinction on the scope of federal power. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:14 am
In re Barnard, 455 F.2d 1370, 1373–74 (D.C.Cir.). [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:05 pm
(Orin Kerr) It is always a pleasure when Randy responds to one of my posts that touches on his areas of expertise. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:12 pm
(Orin Kerr) Congratulations to Randy Barnett in particular for the new Florida decision refusing to dismiss the challenge to the individual mandate. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:36 am
They’re also much cheaper, as they work for free. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:46 am
A reminder that we're planning a great launch event on October 14th, including a panel on Bill C-32 that includes Ian Kerr, Blayne Haggart, Elizabeth Judge, David Lametti, and Teresa Scassa. [read post]
