Search for: "In Re Mueller" Results 921 - 940 of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2020, 11:32 pm by Josh Blackman
Roberts alluded, indirectly to special counsel Robert Mueller. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:44 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Mueller, III, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice Before the Select Committee on Intelligence discussing the government’s use of USA PATRIOT Act authorities in combating international terrorism. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm by Lawrence Higgins
All sessions are taught by Donald Chisum and Janice Mueller. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 2:37 pm
Mueller III reportedly decided to hold back FBI involvement. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am by Elizabeth McAuliffe (Bristows)
  It is not enough that some persons actually engage in the art at the material time laboured under a particular prejudice if a substantial number of others did not (Re Glaxo Group Ltd’s Patent [2004] RPC 43). [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 7:27 pm by John Floyd
If we’re talking about the sheer volume of offenses, the answer is clear: Wells Fargo. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 4:26 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
” Central Staff Committee The Central Staff Committee (CSC) of the EPO is very outspoken about the announcement, in the middle of the coronapandemia, that videoconferencing will be the new standard: we’re being rushed into a change which is full of legal and technical pitfalls. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:12 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
That being said, the current situation post Brexit might offer a unique opportunity to re-think the entire EU patent strategy and the UPCA project a bit more generally. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 6:48 am by Jack Sharman
 Mini we’re not mindfully weighing the expected benefits against the expected costs. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
"The number one thing you hear from lawyers is they're tired of billing their time," says consultant Melba Hughes. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:07 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
In the following days, reporting indicated that Attorney General William Barr had intervened directly in both the Stone case and in the case of another of the president’s associates sentenced during the course of the Mueller investigation, former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn—not to mention other investigations that directly touch on the president’s interests. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
”  The decision to resign, said Ruckelshaus, is inevitable when you’re asked to do something “that your conscience simply will not permit you to do. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm by Hilary Hurd, Benjamin Wittes
After months of public debate, the release of the Mueller report, and witness testimony both in private depositions and in public hearings, the House Judiciary Committee will have by then passed articles of impeachment against President Trump, and the full House of Representatives will have passed them as well. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
I will make your life difficult professionally, because what you’re doing is outrageous. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
In contrast, in 2018, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s consecutive testimony before the House Judiciary Committee and House Intelligence Committee took a combined six hours. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am by Florian Mueller
My blog posts yesterday about the limitations of Apple's ability to lay exclusive claim to modern-day computing technologies -- "10 European judges found Apple had not invented slide-to-unlock (star patent at Samsung trial)" and "In 49 months of holy war, Apple has not proved that it owns any feature other than rubber-banding" -- have already been read widely and they have sparked some debate.All in all, I'm very happy about the reactions I received (and 10% of moronic emails don't matter). [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 9:58 am by Samuel Rebo
“We’re suing Facebook, bitches! [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Carrie Cordero
And I remember that his response was something along the lines of “because we’re just not, we don’t have to, we’re not there, we will get these authorizations done” under the authorities we have. [read post]
Thus it omits writings that may be relevant to Kavanaugh’s views on the investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, which both Benjamin Wittes and Steve Vladeck have discussed. [read post]