Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 4." Results 921 - 940 of 1,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
No. 66-1307, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. (1980), 3-4. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Peters, No. 05-6101 "A sentence imposed on remand for offenses arising out of a tax fraud scheme is reversed and remanded for re-sentencing where the district court's failure to address defendant's "time-served" argument did not satisfy the "procedural reasonableness" requirement required by Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
The maintenance guidelines law which was enacted in 2015 provided that the maintenance income cap would be set initially at $175,000 and would increase pursuant to an adjustment formula keyed to increases in the CPI on January 31, 2016 and every two years thereafter. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Cummings, 14-209, which involves the extension of lawfully initiated traffic stop after reasonable suspicion has dissipated, appears to be a hold for Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
4 The same report noted that certain capital appreciation bonds have facial maturities of greater than 30 years. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:01 pm
In September 2015, Polinsky filed a petition for a third HRO against Bolton. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
In the wake of these revelations, and in response to Juvenile Law Center’s petition for reconsideration, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted the Center’s petition for extraordinary relief on February 11, 2009 and appointed a special master to review all the cases in which Judge Ciavarella committed children to PA Child Care and all cases in which juvenile offenders had waived their right to counsel. [read post]
17 May 2020, 10:18 am by Russell Knight
“[R]estraining a parent’s communication with or proximity to the other parent or the child” 750 ILCS 5/603.10(a)(4) This is the most extreme result of all. [read post]