Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 921 - 940 of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 1:07 pm
I have not blogged the political impact of the Supreme Court's work in Kennedy and Heller, in part because I want to focus on theory and dotrine before turning to politics. [read post]
Justice Kennedy’s opinion—which announced the judgment of the Court and which was joined in full by the Chief Justice and Justice Alito and in part by Justices Scalia and Thomas—was to us quite surprising and disappointing. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:10 am by Lyle Denniston
  (The only Justice still serving on the Court who took part is Clarence Thomas, who dissented.) [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
Abassi was decided by a 4-2 vote, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas and Alito joining Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:29 pm by The Federalist Society
Justice Thomas’s majority opinion was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy, Breyer, and Kagan. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:18 pm by The Federalist Society
The Chief Justice’s majority opinion was joined by Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:09 am by The Federalist Society
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, and Kagan joined the opinion with respect to Part II. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:39 pm
Write a special little section for Kennedy, appealing to his desire to look good at the next Bellagio conference? [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am by Mark Graber
  Think, for example, of Jardines (Scalia and Thomas join three liberals to declare the dog sniff an illegal search), the Arizona vote case (Roberts and Kennedy join the liberals to declare that federal law preempts Arizona’s requirement that persons produce proof of citizenship to vote) or Alleyne v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:52 am
Roberts and Scalia and Thomas and Alito dissenting. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
In Obergefell, Chief Justice Roberts’ dissent was more measured than the expected dyspeptic dissents of Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, each of whom denounced the Court’s decision as a lawless threat to the Republic, but in substance it was a radical challenge to the Court’s historic role in furthering social change. [read post]