Search for: "LONDON V. STATE"
Results 921 - 940
of 4,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2019, 6:50 am
Female councils then allocated the goods, explains [David Graeber, an anthropology professor at the London School of Economics]. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 3:39 am
The 2017 trial saw the joined claims of Illumina & Sequenom (& Ors) v Premaitha and Illumina & Sequenom v Ariosa (& Ors). [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:00 am
London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors, heard 21 May 2019. [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 21 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors. [read post]
17 May 2019, 2:49 pm
,Exxon Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:32 am
Tugushev v (1) Orlov, (2) Roth, (3) Petric [2019] EWHC 645 (Comm) is a case which forms part of a bitter and high-profile battle between two Russian businessmen, the Claimant, Alexander Tugushev, and the First Defendant, Vitaly Orlov, alongside two of Mr Orlov’s associates, in relation to the Norebo Group, which is a corporate group which operates an international fishing business largely under Russian state fishing quotas. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:31 am
Over the years, this divergent state of affairs has been a source of legal uncertainty, which has not done patent owners and the public in general any good. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
An order for access was made by HHJ Luba QC in the Central London County Court. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
The facts of the case The claimant, Justyna, is a Polish national who came to London in 2004. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:17 am
., on Saturday, May 4, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Climate change, Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, Executive Compensation, Index funds, Pay for performance, Shareholder rights, Shareholder value, Shareholder voting, Sustainability Operating Principles for Impact Management Posted by Irina Likhachova, International Finance Corporation, on Sunday, May 5, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Asset management, Corporate… [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:32 pm
At first instance in Central London County Court, HHJ Parfitt had found that the noise from the upper flat was ordinary, everyday noise, but that the first defendant was liable in contract and the first to third defendants were liable in nuisance. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:14 am
Sebastiampillai v Parr. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
The second case was ViiV Healthcare v Minister of Health, where a judicial review was filed earlier this year. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Some Food for Thought After Lee v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
when undertaken by other states. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]