Search for: "LONG v. HARRIS" Results 921 - 940 of 2,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Kyleanne Hunter discussed the potential impacts that overturning Roe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:27 am by Robert Chesney
(See this 2018 Lawfare post from Harry Graver for those details and relevant links.) [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The framework from the Daubert case, which laid out modern standards for admitting expert testimony, has simply broken down in the wake of evidence that many forensic methods are less reliable than long assumed. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:10 pm by Vanessa Sauter
Catherine Padhi discussed why a new cert petition in Attias v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 3:53 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
 The year long Fellowship begins on February 1st, 2013 and runs on till January 31st, 2014.In no particular order the Fellows are:1. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:47 pm by Prashant Reddy
” But if you look at the orders of the Delhi High Court that I mentioned above, Pratibha Textiles had been trying to argue this case long before the complaint filed by the Californian Attorney General Kamala Harris. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:21 am by David Oscar Markus
” So I think we will be waiting for the Roberts papers for a good long time.Rikelman, who argued and won June Medical Services v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 5:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"That one gets less attention because the damage to transparency wasn't done last session but two decades ago in an episode which most folks - cops and reformers alike - have long forgotten, even if it comes up again and again in police accountability contexts.In 1996, a case styled Holmes v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
If you are a lawyer, and used to work for Harry Connick when he was DA, you almost certainly don't. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In that action, three hospitals affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health Plan, an HMO, have appealed a ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that, although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors (UPMC Braddock v Harris, March 30, 2013, (96 EPD ¶44,801)). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm by Richard Kahlenberg
In the words of Justice Harry Blackmun’s opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm by Jeff Gamso
Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983), does not apply to a summary order. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm by Mark Walsh
He then turns to Clerk of the Court Scott Harris for routine bar admissions. [read post]