Search for: "Lee v. United States"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am
United States. [read post]
LXBN This Week Ep. 3: Facebook’s IPO, Oracle v. Google, POM’s “Juice Wars” and U.S. v. Roger Clemens
29 May 2012, 4:26 pm
And lastly we have the second go-around in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 10:10 am
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:56 am
And it may just hope that judges or the decision-makers in competition authorities could be gaslighted when a topic is technical and uneasiness may just be enough to let Apple sustain a harmful monopoly in app distribution.Come May, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hear what Apple has been telling antitrust authorities around the globe for a while. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:02 am
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:55 am
Magistrate Lee concluded that Dr. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
United States Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, authored the Court’s opinion in Williams v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:45 am
Ex parte Clinton Lee Young (2021 Tex. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
No one thought these states were no longer in the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:20 am
The congressional commission that investigated the 2008 financial crisis concluded that the United States’ consumer-protection system was “too fragmented to be effective. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Lee, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. ______________ Carlos Manuel Banegas1 appeals from the judgment entered upon his convictions by jury of second-degree murder (Pen. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:13 am
Kentucky / Lee v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:26 am
Lee, 311 U.S. 32, 45 (1940). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:58 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
The text applies to those who hold "civil office under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am
However, the record does not demonstrate that the court was so vexed that it could not be impartial (22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]; see Liteky v United States, 510 US 540, 555-556 [1994]; Hass & Gottlieb v Sook Hi Lee, 55 AD3d 433, 434 [1st Dept 2008]; People v A.S. [read post]
