Search for: "London v. State" Results 921 - 940 of 3,553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 2:53 pm by NL
London Borough of Haringey v Hines [2010] EWCA Civ 1111 Ms Hines had purchased a property under the right to buy from Haringey in 2002. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:53 pm by NL
London Borough of Haringey v Hines [2010] EWCA Civ 1111 Ms Hines had purchased a property under the right to buy from Haringey in 2002. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:21 am by Emma Boffey and Lorraine Walkinshaw
The appeals On this occasion, the three cases, to be heard over the four days, are all Scottish appeals: Monday 12 June, 11am – 4pmSadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department This appeal relates to the evidential burden on the state when disrupting ‘sham marriages’. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
Scinto v London Borough of Newham [2009] EWCA Civ 837 is an appeal from Bow County Court on whether the tenant was still entitled to exercise her right to buy on terms first set out in December 1999. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:33 am
The IPKat's friends at Euromoney (publisher of Managing Intellectual Property magazine) are moving out of their cosy Blackfriars offices to new premises off London's historical Fleet Street. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
”  Thus, the court overruled the objections of the objecting insurers and entered an Order that the assignment of rights in certain insurance policies to the asbestos trust is valid and enforceable, notwithstanding anti-assignment provisions in the policies.Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London and Certain London Market Companies, as well as another group of insurers, appealed to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 For good measure, however, the court noted Quail Cruises Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 For good measure, however, the court noted Quail Cruises Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In R (ZH &CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham; the Court ruled by a 5-2 majority that Newham and Lewisham were entitled to evict the appellants from the Housing Act 1996, s 188 accommodation without obtaining a court order. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
  If the Supreme Court upholds the judgment of the Court of Appeal, it is likely to lead to greater efficiency in cross-border bankruptcy cases and possibly an increase in insolvency proceedings being launched in London due to its jurisdictional reach. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
Pieretti v London Borough of Enfield [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 This is an odd case, in lots of ways, but what is decided in this appeal to the Court of Appeal is potentially of broader significance and certainly useful as clarification. [read post]