Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation" - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat)… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:18 am
Lord Saville stated that Blair J had given the phrase inherent vice too wide a meaning, a fortuity which was unexceptional or foreseeable was still a fortuity. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm
Nor did Lord Malcom, who did not consider it “necessary to dwell” on the current state of the law concerning whether such a right existed. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:50 am
Q v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 2:10 am
The panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am
This argument was founded on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Gulati v MGN, which concerned systematic phone hacking by journalists from the Mirror Group. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:49 am
In delivering the leading judgment Lord Mance stated that the appellant’s argument that the Scottish Ministers had no power under the 1989 Act to grant consent would be dismissed because it was not supported by the structure and language of the 1989 Act. [read post]
7 May 2015, 1:02 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence be found sufficient, according to the laws of the place where the person sought shall be found, either to justify his committal for trial if the offense of which he is accused had been committed in that place or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting Party. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Good Lord we trust you as a friend. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (o.t.a) v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:52 am
Lord Sumption writes that the UK’s traditional hostility to state interference with free speech stems not only from an attachment to individual liberty, but also from the awareness that such interference inhibits growth. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
DONE at the city of Washington this seventeenth day of November in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred seventy-six and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred first. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm
The principles set out in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] A.C. 22 were stated to apply to all jurisdictions and the principles of legal personality had to be respected. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
Good Lord! [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:24 am
As Lord Neuberger and Lord Sumption stated, “in a negotiated contract between properly advised parties of comparable bargaining power, the strong initial presumption must be that the parties themselves are the best judges of what is legitimate in a provision dealing with the consequences of breach”. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am
Huawei/Conversant v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
Lords Ins Lakeside Foods v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 1:00 am
The panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
