Search for: "M.J. v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2009, 9:08 am
The defense has filed its reply to the Government's opposition to the reconsideration petition in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:27 am
Graves, 1 M.J. 50, 53 (C.M.A. 1975)).United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 4:21 pm
CAAF released its opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:36 pm
Ginn, 47 M.J. 238 (C.A.A.F. 1997), that court shall order a hearing pursuant to United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
EVID. 509 DOES NOT BAR THE GOVERNMENT FROM CALLING THE MILITARY JUDGE FROM A JUDGE-ALONE TRIAL TO TESTIFY AT A DUBAY HEARING AS TO HIS DELIBERATIVE PROCESS.United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:28 am
The Government has filed its opposition to the recon petition in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:39 am
On Friday, the defense filed a petition seeking reconsideration in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
" The two dissenting judges (Erdmann & Ryan, JJ.) argued that the majority's approach was precluded by United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 3:14 am
Magyari, 63 M.J. 123 (C.A.A.F. 2006), continues the presumption of guilt and burden shifting in "naked" urinalysis cases.United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 9:25 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:29 pm
Palenius, 2 M.J. 86 (C.M.A. 1977). [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 9:04 am
CAAF issued a per curiam opinion today in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 2:58 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
