Search for: "MARK ROBERTS "
Results 921 - 940
of 8,643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 6:13 am
Volume 71, Issue 1 (December 2011): Tributes to Professor Robert I. [read post]
12 May 2012, 2:18 pm
Mark Bennett Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:01 am
In this year's survey, thepercentage drops slightly to 73.The web site provides select survey findings.Graphics for the survey and other FOI issues areavailable from McClatchy-Tribune for use duringSunshine Week.Hat tip to Robert Ambrogi's post via Legal Blog Watch. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am
Chief Justice Roberts flatly states that “refusing registration to obscene, vulgar, or profane marks does not offend the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:20 am
Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Breyer filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:12 am
S. 428, 443 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); Mitchell v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
” Additional coverage comes from Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, who reports that “[w]ith Roberts preparing to preside over the impending impeachment trial of President Donald Trump in the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 6:29 am
The events and opportunities are a lecture on trade secrets regimes to be held at the European University Institute on December 12, the 18th Annual International Intellectual Property Lecture by Robert P. [read post]
5 Jan 2025, 11:13 pm
BoA was asked to decide whether the container’s shape served a technical function, thereby preventing it from being protected as a trade mark under Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 3:30 am
The doctrine’s flexibility (and perhaps its opaqueness) has caused many scholars (most notably, Alexandra Roberts) to embrace its capacity both to reconfigure what they perceive as unduly generous approaches to trademark registration and to ensure that validity determinations take account of the context in which marks are used. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:37 pm
Mark your calendars for world-wide Open Access Day! [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 6:59 am
Here’s the Monday morning read: A Supreme Court dispute over a $15,000 IRS bill may be aimed at a never-enacted tax on billionaires (Mark Sherman, The Associated Press) US Supreme Court turns away appeal in PETA undercover recording case (Andrew Chung, Reuters) Supreme Court to consider conservative effort to block federal power and a challenge to ‘qualified immunity’ for police officers (Ariane de Vogue, CNN) Starbucks Preps for Potential Try at Supreme Court… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 6:14 am
Dean Robert Klonoff (Lewis & Clark) and co-authors Mark Herrman and Brad Harrison have posted an Article entitled Making Class Actions Work: The Untapped Potential of the Internet(University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 69, p. 727, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 2:50 pm
It's masterminded by Appleyard Lees and this Kat has a feeling that former guest Kat Robert Cumming has had something to do with it. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:24 pm
(Mark Walsh wrote a fun story about Justice Stevens and the student prayer cases.) [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
Defendant, an Arizona company, is also selling e-cigarette and vaping products under the mark INDIGO VAPOR from the domain indigovaporcompany.com. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:24 am
Mark Asay was convicted of murdering 34-year-old Robert Booker because Booker was black, and 26-year-old Robert McDowell, a transvesdite he thought was a female prostitute. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:01 pm
O'Neill, Special Agent in Charge Susan McCormick, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), and Mark R. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:01 pm
O'Neill, Special Agent in Charge Susan McCormick, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), and Mark R. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 12:54 am
Part 3: trade mark scope & enforcement Chapter 11, by Robert Bone, argues that the likelihood of confusion test should be recalibrated to check for (actual) harms "of the sort that trademark law cares about" [at 278, earlier work here]. [read post]
