Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 921 - 940
of 20,066
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2013, 8:21 am
A district court has broad discretion under Rule 24(b). [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 3:36 pm
§§ 227(b)(3) & (c)(5). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
(b) No reference is made in D1 to the mask subtraction step. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:16 am
"[I]t is clear that the [patent-in-suit] is drawn to unpatentable subject matter. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 7:55 pm
Answer: Pick one -- (a) never; or (b) when the party is a violent criminal serving the sentence he earned.Until Saturday, I didn't know anyone who would pick (b) over (a).On that day, however, I learned that it can be OK for a judge to be an advocate for a party when he has "a strong vision of legal justice and then act[s] in service to that vision. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:58 pm
B. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:01 am
Brink Dickerson of Troutman Sanders was wondering about how practices have evolved – or eroded – for bolstering the “due diligence” defense available to directors under Section 11(b)(3) of the 1933 Act. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:06 pm
T-Rex Property, AB v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:29 am
In this respect, a discrepancy between this embodiment and the claimed subject-matter appears in the terminology used. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Two threads in conversation: realist—rules don’t matter b/c market pressure will change results—and rule-based: we need rules to cabin some expansions. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
It follows from the above considerations that the subject-matter of claim 1 of this request lacks the requirements of A 54(1) and (2) EPC 1973 in the light of the disclosure of D4. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:59 pm
District Judge Samuel B. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 1:01 am
Susan B. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:23 am
§ 1229a(b)(5)(A). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 5:55 am
Yet after all of this, John B. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
For reformers: focusing on certification mark rules won’t matter if most certification happens in TMs. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
[T]he Board is under no obligation to accept such allegations as true. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 11:08 am
Thus, the disclaimer was not so unambiguous and express that a reasonable consumer couldn’t be deceived as a matter of law.However, the complaint still flunked 9(b) because it didn’t discuss whether plaintiffs saw the asterisk; whether they read the corresponding disclaimer; and if they did read it, how the disclaimer affected their purchasing decision. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:00 pm
As expressed in criminal defense, this means that the defendant isn't really culpable. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Jeanne Fromer: lack of symmetry b/t incumbents and other participants. [read post]
