Search for: "MATTER OF C S"
Results 921 - 940
of 34,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2008, 5:19 pm
As stated in Supreme Court Rule 206(c)(1), "The deponent in a discovery deposition may be examined regarding any matter subject to discovery under these rules. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:35 pm
Medicare is the nation's largest health care plan covering nearly 40 million Americans. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
" The CCA's comments on the C-32 digital lock provisions: Bill C-32 prohibits the circumvention of TPMs for legal purposes such as preservation activities used by archivists to protect the documentary heritage of Canada. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 12:51 pm
Here's an open thread for all non-election related matters. [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 3:26 am
The court's ability to hear a CPO matter in Washington, D.C. requires proof an "intra-family offense" with sufficient connection to the District. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:40 am
” You may ask why any of this matters. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:54 am
The printed matter doctrine states that “[c]laim limitations directed to printed matter are not entitled to patentable weight unless the printed matter is functionally related to the substrate on which the printed matter is applied. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:45 am
NYT’s counsel has sent Dave a C&D letter - see below. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:26 pm
§ 1292(c)(1). (...)In Woodard, this court stated that "[a]n order which is deemed to deny a preliminary injunction readily satisfies the Carson requirements. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:07 pm
Finally, the application of Nathaniel C. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:07 pm
Finally, the application of Nathaniel C. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 10:54 am
In recent decisions, for example, the cause of action test has been used to characterise claims between third parties as contractual matters (C-337/17 Feniks, blogged here; C-772/17 Reitbauer, blogged here; joined cases C-274/16, C-447/16 and C-448/16 flightright). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Petitioner's contentions concerning other alleged adverse employment actions are not properly before us inasmuch as the adverse action alleged in the complaint filed with SDHR is limited to the RPD's failure to issue petitioner a smaller service weapon (see generally 9 NYCRR 465.3 [c] [3]) and there is no evidence that either petitioner or the SDHR amended the complaint to expand the scope of the case (see 9 NYCRR 465.4 [a], [c]; see generally… [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Petitioner's contentions concerning other alleged adverse employment actions are not properly before us inasmuch as the adverse action alleged in the complaint filed with SDHR is limited to the RPD's failure to issue petitioner a smaller service weapon (see generally 9 NYCRR 465.3 [c] [3]) and there is no evidence that either petitioner or the SDHR amended the complaint to expand the scope of the case (see 9 NYCRR 465.4 [a], [c]; see generally… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:38 am
The board has also considered Rule 48(1)(c) EPC (Rule 34(1)(c) EPC 1973) as a possible le [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
The Act provided that a seaman who believed he was the subject of such discrimination could bring an action in federal court and seek appropriate relief including restraining actions that Act prohibits, reinstatement of the seaman’s employment and pay, and costs and attorney’s fees. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:48 pm
C. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:04 am
., No 12 C 2100, Slip Op. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:18 am
Naeemi, No. 14 C 4731, Slip Op. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:04 am
., No 12 C 2100, Slip Op. [read post]
