Search for: "MERCK "
Results 921 - 940
of 3,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
A Texas intermediate appeals court has vacated its May 14 decision, which had dismissed a $7.75 million judgment against Merck & Co. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 8:00 am
Despite a controversial provision in the Merck-Vioxx settlement agreement, reports indicate that enough claimants have signed on to the $4.85 billion settlement to keep the deal moving forward. [read post]
31 Jul 2006, 12:03 pm
As jury selection gets underway in the 2nd Federal Vioxx trial in New Orleans, there are more than 13-thousand other cases filed against Merck. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:28 am
Thousands of users of Fosamax suffered this side effect and sued Merck. [read post]
31 Jul 2006, 12:03 pm
As jury selection gets underway in the 2nd Federal Vioxx trial in New Orleans, there are more than 13-thousand other cases filed against Merck. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 7:34 am
In the last few days the following articles have appeared in the media: o FDA's Position on New Drugs May Hurt Merck's Arcoxia Bido Big Pharma's Achilles' Heelo Amgen's Star Fades Amid Safety Questionso Doctors: Arthritis Drug Arcoxia Risky Tooo FDA Says Bladder Drug Needs Child Warningso FDA Is Asked to Halt Celebrex Ado FDA Targets Unapproved Nausea Drugso Experts: New Merck Drug Won't Get OK [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:36 pm
Attorney's for Merck quickly pointed out they did not agree and blamed her death on everything they could think of in rejecting liability for her tragic end. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
The jury never got to the question of whether Merck's warning on Fosamax was adequate. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 6:33 pm
And you can read Merck’s press release here. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:35 am
Florida AP reports that a federal judge declared a mistrial last Friday in a trial over whether Merck & Co.'s former blockbuster osteoporosis drug, Fosamax, causes painful jaw bone destruction. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 3:52 pm
Merck was the New Jersey state appellate decision that came down in May and addressed a half dozen issues that concern readers of this blog. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:59 pm
The plaintiffs are accusing Merck of failing to adequately warn consumers of the risks and not properly researching the drug. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:29 am
But againâ€"Merck is going to ride this out as long as they can. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
The main action concerning Merck’s request for a compulsory license is still pending. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:50 am
In Merck & Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 10:37 am
Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough have agreed to settle class action lawsuits over their joint cholesterol drugs, Vytorin and Zetia, in the amount of $41.5 million. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:35 pm
You may also be entitled to make a claim against Merck. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:32 pm
Had Fallon sided with Merck, the drug company also could have challenged claims brought by thousands of other plaintiffs who say it is to blame for heart attacks and other cardiovascular problems. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:03 pm
Of course we will continue to watch for more medical research and trials concerning the safety of Merck's NuvaRing birth control product, especially the possible continuation of the FDA NuvaRing safety study which was done in 2011, as mentioned above. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
Merck and Sessner v. [read post]
