Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 921 - 940
of 5,978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 6:53 am
In the meantime, the matter returned to the Hoge Raad (HR), the Dutch Supreme Court, for a final decision on 8 September 2023, a good reason for an update and overview of the outcome. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:14 am
Or, failing that, Harold C. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
What public is "relevant" depends, of course, on the goods or services at issue. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Gibson: is the point to get more cases before judges b/c judges do a good job? [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:14 am
The degree of similarity of the goods should be considered in relation to the degree of similarity of the marks. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:20 pm
Marty felt that the amount of money pumped into top level domain names would ensure that they'd remain important for a good few years to come. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:57 am
What they said, in a judgment delivered by Toulson LJ, was this: * In the case of an alleged infringement under section 10(2) of the Trade Marks 1994 Act (similar marks/goods, similar marks/same goods or same marks/similar goods) giving rise to criminal liability under section 92, a likelihood of confusion had to be proved -- but no likelihood of confusion need be proved for liability under section 10(1) (same marks/same… [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 3:46 am
Applicant sought registration under Section 2(f), contending that its prior registration of a similar mark (Rule 2.41(b)), its long and continuous use of the applied-for mark, high sales figures, and evidence of infringement of its mark by competitors constituted a prima facie showing of acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 10:40 am
Her brief begins: Pro Se Appellant DEIRDRE C. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
It’s not enough to say public domain is good; need to know why. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
C. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 5:48 am
The ad did not attempt to link PruittHealth’s marks directly to McHugh Fuller’s own goods or services. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 9 December 2013 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:03 am
These included Case C‑655/11 P, Seven for all mankind LLC v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Seven SpA. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
” He concluded that there was a good arguable case that the director was a joint tortfeasor, and so will be a joint defendant in the trial for UK TM infringement and passing-off. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 11:00 pm
Picture on the left in the public domain.Picture on the right (c) by Dr Judit Banhidi [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:41 am
Internet users looking at the ad must be able to realise that this is not the trade mark proprietor offering its goods or services but a third party. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:06 am
March 20, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Nieves & Nieves LLC, Serial No. 85179243 [Two refusals to register PRINCESS KATE for jewelry, bedding, wallets, handbags, and the like, and clothing, on the grounds that (1) under Section 2(a) because the mark may falsely suggest a connection with Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, the wife of Prince William of England, and (2) under Section 2(c) because the mark consists of or includes a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
In the present dispute there was no likelihood of confusion although the goods were identical or similar and the marks had a certain degree of similarity. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
" A trade mark enthusiast asks ...Article 5(5) of the EU's Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 addresses "protection against the use of a sign other than for the purposes of distinguishing goods or services". [read post]
