Search for: "Marketing Concepts, Inc." Results 921 - 940 of 1,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2008, 12:18 am
In short, the picture painted by Vincent was of a friendly, giant, caring and pro-market patent troll that existed only to help its licensees, not to mug them. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
Forum non conveniens (Latin for “forum not agreeing”) is a well-established common law concept. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by Bexis
  That's a red herring we remember from all the way back to airbag preemption days:The Court of Appeals’ solution − that [defendant] should simply have pulled [the drug] from the market in order to comply with both state and federal law − is no solution. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  However, Dubé acknowledged that if a lawyer who was willing to pay for a copy of an article to review it didn’t pay, that would affect the potential market for copies. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  There are a number of ways that this happens:In Dyer, for example, the plaintiff contended that a drug should not have been marketed for a particular use. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Marketing 48-55 (April 1978); Vincent-Wayne Mitchell & Vassilios Papavassiliou, Exploring Consumer Confusion in the Watch Market, 15 Marketing Intelligence & Planning 164-172 (1997)There aren’t very many good studies about confusion. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
King, Chief Legal Officer, Avvo, Inc.: Avvo was sued on launch, taking issue with profiles of lawyers. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Glenn
Google, Inc. will likely run into some especially significant barriers, no pun intended. 3. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:34 pm by N. Peter Rasmussen
Several major participants in this market have not yet commented on the proposals, including two of the most active firms, Penson Financial Services, Inc. and Wedbush Securities. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:42 am by John McFarland
The Court concluded by chastising the parties for failing to be clear in their drafting of the lease: It is difficult to fathom that the parties, when executing the leases, shared a mutual common conception of what was to be covered by [the add-back clause]. [read post]