Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 921 - 940
of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2014, 12:19 pm
The case is called Nowrouzi et. al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
Daprizio v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
See, e.g., Braun, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:24 pm
Casey Road Food and Beverage, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, No. 17-13043, 13 March 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 3:07 am
Neither of the lead opinions in Matal v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 7:21 pm
Shugart v Chapman, middle district, 2:08-cv-1016-MEF. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
Elsewhere it won’t be changing either because the Member State isn’t interested or it can’t legally change. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 1:09 pm
It's got tons of details about the defendant's life, the crime, the procedural complexities of the trial, the attitude of the state court judge and their rulings, etc. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
The plaintiff then appealed further to the Spanish Supreme Court, requested the modification of its traditional doctrine and supporting this request with legal and social arguments.Among the legal arguments, it was pointed out how this doctrine was against the principle of unitary protection sought by the Directive 2008/95 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, according to which the owner of the later trade mark had no ius utendiwhich could… [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:04 am
Trial evidence supported the district court’s judgment, blocking registration of VAGISAN in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:55 pm
Chief Justice Robert’s opinion in Halo v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:52 pm
Enter Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
One observer noted that it was difficult to see how Courts of different member states would follow this (controversial) relief when Courts from different me [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
There is a likelihood of confusion between the Marks BETPACK and BETDAQ and the registration of a confusingly similar mark is contrary to the provisions of Community Law prohibiting the registration of the Trade Mark in the State, particularly Council Regulations regarding the registration of trade marks. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:11 am
Clontech Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am
Some however, were blocked or cancelled (including the Washington Redskins mark) on that basis before the Supreme Court held the bar unconstitutional in Matal v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:24 am
Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:04 am
Executive Coach Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]
