Search for: "Martin v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 2,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Following the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei, which stated that English courts can decide FRAND terms on a worldwide basis, English courts have become a popular forum for litigating SEP related disputes and it seems that they will likely continue to be so. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 7:14 pm
§ 922 that prohibit non-residents of the United States from receiving or selling firearms for non-sporting purposes. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The state relies primarily on a 1976 case, De Canas v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
The first book is a dissection of the Trayvon Martin case with a highly critical analysis of the prosecution’s presentation in People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, engineered largely by Henry Clay, temporarily settled the issue of where slavery would be permitted in the United States, establishing the Mason-Dixon Line as the boundary between free and slave states. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:30 am
United States Koreans Becoming Younger – Unification of Age-Counting Systems Congress.gov January 2023 New, Tip, and Top Syndication Regulation and TV’s Big Three: Broadcasting Regulations and 1970s Television The Global Legal Monitor is our online publication covering legal news and developments worldwide. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Jordan Brunner
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:15 pm by Tom Withers
Jordan “engaged in criminal conduct . . . on nine separate occasions, [and] used a counterfeit badge and his United States Marshal credentials to pose as an on-duty U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am by Jeff Gamso
United States when he said that the Constitution offered no protection for falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [read post]