Search for: "Matter of Henderson"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
Circuit granted an injunction pending appeal by a 2-1 vote (Judges Henderson and Brown, with Judge Tatel dissenting) in the consolidated Priests for Life and Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Washington cases; and the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:30 am
Readers with a historical sensibility will recall Mary Jo Frug’s powerful feminist reading of the Dawson, Harvey, and Henderson Contracts casebook (Mary Joe Frug, Re-Reading Contracts: A Feminist Analysis of a Contracts Casebook, 34 Am. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
Mishcon de Reya’s Data Matters blog has provided useful context on this matter. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
” The timing mattered. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
In conclusion, I testified that "the state had discriminated against me at least in part because of anti-gay animus, and its own documents indicated that there was not a rational basis at work; I was lied to and denied the process long established by the law school's own procedures and probably also guaranteed by the Due Process Clause; and I was probably also being disciplined for various intellectual positions I had taken on matters of law school policy, including my leadership… [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 4:33 pm
Terribly provocative and dangerously destabilizing as a political matter, at least with regard to China’s threat of defensive emergency actions, but are China’s actions illegal under international law? [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm
Specifically, Henderson writes, “With a few exceptions, the support for your conclusion comes from commentators, not States. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
Coverage by a range of UK media outlets can be found below: The Guardian has covered the context and development of the matter as has the BBC. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:56 pm
In fact, it has been established for well over a century that there is no difference between in-house and external solicitors: see Henderson v Merthyr Tydfil UDC [1900] 1 QB 434, QBD.Next in time we get to Metropolitan Property Realizations Ltd v Moss [2013] UKUT 415 (LC).MPR had a 199 year lease of a property, which was owned by Thanet DC. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 11:57 am
(Yes, I'm oversimplifying again; it doesn't matter here.) [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
My own interests don’t really matter Being responsible for innovation is exciting. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:33 am
Nowhere, for that matter, does Lippe define what a "fully functional lawyer" is. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:56 pm
In fact, it has been established for well over a century that there is no difference between in-house and external solicitors: see Henderson v Merthyr Tydfil UDC [1900] 1 QB 434, QBD.Next in time we get to Metropolitan Property Realizations Ltd v Moss [2013] UKUT 415 (LC).MPR had a 199 year lease of a property, which was owned by Thanet DC. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
The district court granted the Defendants' motion to stay the suit and ordered the matter to arbitration. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:11 am
[Photo: Michael Henderson] The IPKat suspects two reasons for emphasising Infopaq in this manner. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 3:17 am
The topic, as a constitutional matter, occupied the Supreme Court in a string of decisions that began with a trio in 1967 and continued for several years, but has been left largely unexamined for three decades since. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:51 pm
Therefore, since healing and wellness are reliant upon behavior, subduing the internal animal with a proverbial harness is a matter of embarking on a campaign to win the internal war against a ruthless, powerful and cunning adversary. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:03 pm
As with all great law librarians, Rob and Bill never treated the requests as a pain or an unwanted imposition on their time – no matter whether the request was extremely basic or highly complicated. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:01 pm
Justice Henderson excluded a surreptitiously recorded videotape of an independent medical examination. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:39 pm
(Originally published by Legal Evolution on October 16, 2022) Source: “Legal Innovation After Reform: Evidence from Regulatory Change,” Deborah L. [read post]
