Search for: "Matter of Newman"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 10:15 pm
Klein (CAFC 2010-1411) Judges Newman, Schall (author), and Linn Under the Patent Act, "[a] patent may not be obtained . . . if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:46 am
the subject matter of the deception must be “material” and 4. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:57 am
How to know what matters and what does not? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:57 am
How to know what matters and what does not? [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
That was as a matter of public law. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:47 pm
The district court dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that there was no case or controversy between the parties. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Becton, Dickinson et al (CAFC 2008-1511, 1512, -1513, -1514, 1595) precedential; en banc; opinion by Chief Judge Rader, joined in full by Newman, Lourie, Linn, Moore, and Reyna; O'Malley dissents-in-part; dissent by: Bryson (author), Gajarsa, Dyk, and Prost Prosecution backdrop - Abbott filed the original application leading to the '551 patent in 1984. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:34 am
”Proper planning can set your estate, your assets, and your family in line for a smooth transition but improper or incomplete planning can bring untold hardship, especially if the matter ends up in court. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:00 am
Proper planning can set your estate, your assets, and your family in line for a smooth transition but improper or incomplete planning can bring untold hardship, especially if the matter ends up in court. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
The two cases cover the same subject matter. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:06 pm
We review the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction de novo. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:14 pm
The Appeals Court concluded, "The district court's denial of an award of attorney fees and litigation costs is vacated, and this matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to award RBCA's fees and costs that were reasonably incurred in furtherance of the Clean Water Act's purpose. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:06 pm
If you have a patent infringement matter, we are patent litigation attorneys so please feel free to contact us. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:05 pm
The DissentWriting in dissent in Hynix, Judge Gajarsa joined by Judge Newman takes the majority to task for its overriding drive to arrive at a consistent result in Hynix and Micron, a drive that in their view produced an erroneous result: Seizing on the district court’s alleged grafting of an overly strict “gloss” on the reasonably foreseeable litigation standard, the majority claims that the district court erred as a matter of law by applying the wrong standard… [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:16 pm
If you have a patent infringement matter, we are patent litigation attorneys so please feel free to contact us. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm
Following that exchange, the district court took the matter under advisement. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
"Since the purpose [of civil contempt] is remedial, it matters not with what intent the defendant did the prohibited act. . . . [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:24 am
Simon has a good idea of what’s in the pipeline,” said Newman. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:04 pm
Judge Newman dissented – arguing that the approach conflicts with prior precedent: Earlier cases applied the law of infringement as a straightforward matter of tortious responsibility. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:30 pm
Judge Whyte and Judge Newman disagreed with the district court. [read post]
