Search for: "Miner v Miner"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
’ ConocoPhillips Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 11:24 am
Warren v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:19 am
On April 27 the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perryman v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:19 am
On April 27 the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perryman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:49 am
The 1978 decision, Oliphant v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 9:21 am
Class 37: Building, construction or demolition of facilities or installations for exploration, exploitation, processing, production, storage, transport or distribution of hydrocarbons, hydrogen, minerals, bitumen, fuels, illuminants, lubricants, industrial oil or energy; installation, cleaning, repair or maintenance of facilities or installations for exploration, exploitation, processing, production, storage, transport or distribution of hydrocarbons, hydrogen, minerals, bitumen,… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:16 pm
Now, almost fifty years later, the case presents a conflict between the National Park Service (the Service) and owners of certain mineral estates in the Padre Island National Seashore (the Seashore), with respect to those mineral owners' rights of ingress and egress over the Seashore's surface; such rights, if recognized, would allow the owners to exploit the subsurface minerals contained on the Island. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:29 am
” Miner Elec., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 8:43 am
They challenged the Minerals Management Service's (MMS) approval of an exploration plan submitted by Shell Offshore Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 6:27 am
In Zelnik v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:43 am
On October 19, 2010, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued its opinion in Marin v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:03 am
Southern Illinois Miners, LLC, Opposition Nos. 91183196 and 91183698 [Sections 2(d) and 43(c) oppositions to MINERS and SOUTHERN ILLINOIS MINERS & Design for professional baseball entertainment services and ancillary goods, in light of the registered marks MINERS and several mining-related designs for collegiate athletic entertainment services and ancillary goods].August 8, 2012 - 2 PM: Syndicat Des Proprietaires Viticulteurs De Chateauneuf-Du-Pape v.… [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:00 am
XTO Energy, Inc. et al, and Maddox v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:29 am
In Mesa Southern CWS Acquisition v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:37 pm
Even unleased landowners are required to pay their proportion of the production expenses under the Louisiana Mineral Code. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:37 am
On July 14, 2015, by a vote of 5-2, the Supreme Court of Ohio sua sponte dismissed as improvidently accepted Kuhn v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 7:17 am
” Which category fits the plaintiffs in Tipton v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 5:31 am
Co-author Chance Decker Gloria’s Ranch v. [read post]
