Search for: "Mounts v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
Rogers, the United States Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment does not categorically require the state to provide counsel for all indigent parents facing a civil contempt hearing for non-payment of child support where the other parent is also not represented by counsel. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel and Sherry F. Colb
From outer space, when people see the United States, they would see Trump Wall. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
(HERE).The Conference brought together some of the most important and influential thinkers about the fundamentals of law in general, and that of the United States in particular. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Ruling Heard ‘Round the Country: Baehr v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
By 2010, former two-term governor Jerry Brown decided someone had to save this state, so he mounted a modestly-financed campaigned against the winner of the GOP primary, Meg Whitman, who carried so much GOP baggage into the general election that even spending $180 million (of mostly her own money) could not prevent her from being crushed by Brown. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:37 am by Administrator
In November 2005, "a senior United States official" asked Canada to consent to further delay in Khadr's release so that the US officials "could 'get their act together' with respect to extradition plans. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:07 am by John Inazu and Burt Neuborne
When the Supreme Court extended the right of assembly beyond the federal government to the states in its unanimous 1937 decision, De Jonge v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  (Source: here ) No contingency fee system:  Contingency fee arrangement has been one of the distinguishing features of litigation in the United States. [read post]