Search for: "NO PARTY V. NO PARTY" Results 921 - 940 of 120,091
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2024, 10:00 am by Nick Ortiz
Courts consider several factors, known as the “Chambless factors,” named after the case Chambless v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
Accordingly, the ECtHR did not have to adjudicate which party held an actual proprietary right to the statue.[17] This allowed the Court to bypass all the – rather thorny – questions of choice of law, which typically plague cultural property disputes.[18] In this case, for example, the ECtHR found that, after forty years of continuous possession, the Getty Museum had acquired a fair expectation in the “peaceful enjoyment” of the statue. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:09 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
The trial judge uses something called the Daubert standard (in reference to a case called Daubert v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alison L. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:26 am by Phil Dixon
Unrelated officer misconduct was not material on the facts of the case; motion to enforce plea bargain properly denied where the parties had not reached a firm agreement U.S. v. [read post]
These were therefore parallel and similar revocation actions before the central and local divisions, so that all parties agreed that the revocation counterclaim should be referred to the central division. [read post]
These were therefore parallel and similar revocation actions before the central and local divisions, so that all parties agreed that the revocation counterclaim should be referred to the central division. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONCaesar v Metropolitan Transp. [read post]