Search for: "P V Holding Corporation" Results 921 - 940 of 1,781
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2020, 9:21 am by Florence Campbell Jones
Gray and others v G-T-P Group Ltd: Re F2G Realisations Ltd (in liquidation) [2010] EWHC 1772 (Ch) held that a charge characterised as a floating charge over financial collateral will only qualify as a floating charge under the Regulations if “legal control” as opposed to “administrative control” of the underlying financial collateral is transferred to the collateral-taker. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am by admin
Taken as a whole, these actions signal the market for corporate control in Canada – especially when it comes to foreign buyers – is effectively closed. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Lemen, 40 Cal.4th 1141, 156 P.3d 339, 343 (Cal. 2007) (permanent injunction allowed) with Willing v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:59 am by WSLL
Holdings: The Court found that the district court correctly interpreted Wyo. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The 2001 Judgment covered fees plaintiff owed the Perlberger defendants for legal services rendered in two commercial litigations: Lutin v New Jersey Steel Corporation, et al. and D.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Richard Renner
The decision reverses a narrow holding by the Seventh Circuit U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
" Roberts, confronting attorney Seth P. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
In the end, it leaves us with a quite narrow holding, a sense of specific approaches to meaning making  but no sense of when these forms of meaning making may be triggered (e.g. when one can convince a judge to undertaken it?) [read post]