Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC."
Results 921 - 940
of 2,327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 5:02 am
Take, for example, the 1999 case of Encore Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:10 pm
City of Hope Nat’l Med. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:36 pm
In Burlington, a government contractor, Breaking Solutions, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:13 am
City of Brownsville, No. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:08 am
On behalf of a victim’s estate, a plaintiff sued A Forever Recovery, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
See City of Keller v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2017, 7:00 am
Accusearch Inc., 570 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 2009). [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:35 am
Sirva, defendant Allied Van Lines (“Allied”) and its corporate parent Sirva, Inc., had contracted with Astro Moving and Storage Co. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
Laroe Estates, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am
Helmerich & Payne International, a unanimous court held that a case falls under the expropriation exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act only if the property in which the party claims to hold rights was taken in violation of federal law. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:26 pm
Trek Development Group, Inc., The Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (URA), and the City of Pittsburgh appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County reversing the decision of the City’s Zoning Board of Adjustment – granting Trek’s variances and special exception. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
(As a matter of disclosure, I represent the real parties, the Ohlsons, in this action.) [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:42 am
Sirva, Inc., to answer three questions that had been certified by the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
City of Houston, 16-515 Issu [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Caira, which holds that individuals have no reasonable expectation of privacy in information held by a third party. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 7:08 am
The Department of Justice has reached a settlement agreement under which BioFusion Health Products Inc. will pay $3,000 to resolve claims that the Rapid City, South Dakota-based company violated the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) when it failed to reemploy a South Dakota Air National Staff Sergeant after an extended military leave and when it eventually terminated her employment. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:40 am
The Urban Wildlands Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 10:23 am
However, both of these models, under the right circumstances, have proven effective in compelling the parties to find a way to compromise and break the deadlock to avoid the potential of one party actually deciding to resort to this provision. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:49 am
The appeal was brought by a company called Leidos Holdings Inc., a Reston, Va. [read post]
