Search for: "PEREZ v. STATE" Results 921 - 940 of 1,180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 1:44 pm by Orin Kerr
Discriminatory failure to investigate and prosecute crimes has been a major problem for victims of sexual assault and violence against women (something the Supreme Court acknowledged, then disregarded, in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 4:59 pm
What, if any, are the minimum, constitutionally-guaranteed substantive attributes or rights that are embodied within the fundamental constitutional “right to marry” that is referred to in cases such as Perez v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 3:35 am
Perez Moya v City of New York (9 Misc 3d 332 Sup Ct, Kings County 2005)(Superintendent's knowledge of the residency of child imputed to the City); Polidori v Societe Generale Group., 236 NYLJ 112 (Sup Ct NY County 2006) (Knowledge of sexual harassment will be imputed to employer if supervisor of a sufficiently high level is aware of the harassment), affd, 39 AD3d 404 (1st Dept 2007). [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, it is evident from the record that counsel was trying to avoid the "overbooking of cases" (Pichardo-Garcia v Josephine's Spa Corp., 91 AD3d 413, 414 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Perez v New York City Hous. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by Kevin Russell
   That task was made difficult by a prior decision,  Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am by Anthony Gaughan
Iqbal (and the 2007 case of Bell Atlantic v Twombly) held is insufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has reinstated a disability discrimination claim, holding that a jury may find that the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office failed to reasonably accommodate the plaintiff's disability, a back injury.The case is Tafolla v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
And he got plenty of grilling, like from Chief Justice Ronald George: When Lavy tried arguing a distinction in Perez v. [read post]