Search for: "POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 2" Results 921 - 940 of 1,462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2014, 6:35 pm
” On February 3, 2011, [Illinois State Police] Lieutenant [John] Coffman wrote a letter to David revoking his FOID card under § 8(f) of the Act based on the false and unreasonable assertion that David had a “mental condition” within the meaning of that provision. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:13 pm by David
That doesn’t sound much like the profile of an actor or magician, and especially not of the biggest box office draw in vaudeville. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 2: The Product Market DimensionRobert Burrell: why do we treat territorial and product markets so differently? [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
John DiIulio had warned of a similar danger: “that measurement-driven government workers will, so to speak, ‘set up the target in order to facilitate shooting. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
Louis Metropolitan Police Department Sex Offender Registration Office to determine whether Doe was required to register as a sex offender. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Hamilton, 2014 ONSC 447 http://t.co/o5vbiOn7pO -> Eksmo Publishing House's lawsuit against social network to be heard on Apr.7 http://t.co/zO311SaKEE -> Link to Voltage v John Doe disclosure of subscriber info from ISP http://t.co/LlSiWZbr6E -> File-Sharing Site Owner Handed 2 Year Suspended Sentence | News | The Moscow Times http://t.co/RnNqgHvSJq -> Massachusetts High Court Requires Warrant for Cell Phone Tracking http://t.co/wVHO1sJagN -> "Are moral… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by MBettman
In a unanimous decision, the Court held that in this murder trial it was improper to admit a non-testifying accomplice’s out-of-court statements identifying the defendant through the testimony of an investigating police officer. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
In addition, he was previously appointed by the Justice Department to serve as an independent monitor of the Metropolitan (DC) Police Department and Virgin Islands Police Department. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm by Gordon Firemark
In a 2-to-1 decision, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that various NCAA Football Video games made by Electronic Arts (EA) did not sufficiently transform Hart’s identity. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Two keys to licensing model: (1) clarity on what user gets, (2) respect for user. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:39 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:56 pm by Kevin
The answer is, of course, number 5, because the correct answer is actually number 2. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]