Search for: "Paine v. State Bar" Results 921 - 940 of 1,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2009, 11:22 pm
At trial, he argued they should be admitted under Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 803(3), which says a hearsay statement is not excluded by the rule barring hearsay it if is a statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, and bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates… [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat)   Algeria A to Z of African official IP websites: no. 1 Algeria (Afro-IP)   Australia FCA awards ‘additional damages’ for HSV design infringement: GM Holden Ltd v Paine (Patentology) Australian R&D tax credit to commence on 1 July 2011 (Patentology)   Brazil Brazil introduces OER into federal legislation and adopts local government policy (Creative Commons) TV in bars to pay royalties (IP tango)   Canada Access Copyright &… [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:28 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The statute reads in part: “(V)iolation of a criminal statute, ordinance or regulation by a plaintiff which contributed to said injury, death or damage, shall be considered as evidence of negligence of that plaintiff, but the violation of said statute, ordinance or regulation shall not as a matter of law and for that reason alone, serve to bar a plaintiff from recovery. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:34 am by David DePaolo
Not only does it evince bipolar conceptualization, but the contradiction in terms is the basis for interesting judicial results.In Schultz v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:25 pm
Marine--produced essentially the same lineup as last year's ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
REPUBLICAN MULVANEY MONKEY-WRENCH GAMBIT MOVES TO DC COURT Below is the text of the complaint and request for instanter restraining order (TRO) filed by one of the  dueling directors against the other [conversion from pdf]Original in pdf may be view here  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEANDRA ENGLISH, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552, Plaintiff,… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
REPUBLICAN MULVANEY MONKEY-WRENCH GAMBIT MOVES TO DC COURT Below is the text of the complaint and request for instanter restraining order (TRO) filed by one of the  dueling directors against the other [conversion from pdf]Original in pdf may be viewed here  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEANDRA ENGLISH, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552,… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/840393.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Jonathan Shaub
”  “To say that I regret my past words, any pain that I caused my family and any concerns I would cause my country would be hard for me to really express properly. [read post]