Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 921 - 940
of 23,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
He's sentenced -- not surprisingly -- to death.And, again, another unanimous opinion -- again by Justice Liu -- affirming.P.S. - I agree with Justice Liu that the trial court's attempt to "create levity" in this capital case was not exactly well-conceived. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:29 pm
I'm not saying that Justice Sims is wrong and I'm right. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm
The last time I saw the Justice was at the oral argument in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 1:28 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 11:26 am
The substantive objection in the case, Fensterstock v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm
Kennedy not only joined the 5-justice majority in Casey, but also the 5-justice majority in the 2016 case of Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:33 am
Certainly that proposition is not supported by the only two cases the People cite. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am
Dorsen, The Unexpected Scalia: A Conservative Justice’s Liberal Opinions; Bryan Garner, Nino and Me: My Unusual Friendship with Justice Antonin Scalia; Richard Hasen, The Justice of Contradictions: Antonin Scalia and the Politics of Disruption; and Catherine Langford, Scalia v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:00 am
The post Supreme Court Justices: Lady Hale Lecture appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Gideon v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:00 am
In Vegelahn v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:52 am
As a sidebar, Justice Sotomayor noted that she (and all of us in the room) was a child of Brown v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 2:52 pm
To avoid forfeiture of the bond, the bail company insists that the bond is "void" because it was for the wrong amount, citing a Court of Appeal case from 1919 that so holds (albeit arguably in dicta).Justice Stewart holds -- eminently sensibly, in my view -- that the bond isn't void. [read post]
22 May 2023, 2:53 pm
Hu was formerly the President of the Stanford Law Review, so I'm sure the justices were rightly confident that he'd do a great job.It probably also helps, just a little, that he's a former law clerk to Justice Liu. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:05 am
In Hewitt v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 4:50 pm
Rasul v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:34 am
" In the book he attacks the Second Amendment decision in D.C. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
Colorado, Timbs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Chief Justice Warren wrote the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:00 pm
Since the Supreme Court recognized marriage equality in Obergefell v. [read post]
