Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The decision by Justice O’Donnell in R. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am
Wells noted the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:53 am
However he recognised that the issue has a transnational dimension and has important implications for many millions of people across the EU making use of the internet. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:08 pm
” (Shaaban Bin Hussien v Chong Fook Kam [1970] AC 942, at 948). [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
As Lord Henry Brougham declared and the Supreme Court of Canada embraced in R v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 6:21 pm
God's Hope Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
Chistopher Columbus at the Royal Court of Spain, by Václav Brožik c.1884 This Easter Sunday, March 31, marks the 521st anniversary of the issuance of the Alhambra Decree. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:38 am
Follow the sun … I got into a twitter exchange with people from TC Young, a firm of housing solicitors in Glasgow, pondering on whether we should take Lord Fraud’s advice and follow the work, opening a mortgage repo defence firm on the Costa del Sol. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
” 18 months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
I HATE THE LORD GOD FOR GIVING YOU LIFE!!!!!!!!! [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
Exemplary damages for libel were upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of Hill v Church of Scientology ([1995] 2 SCR 1130). [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
And this actually should make sense in connection with Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
Wikipedia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am
To paraphrase Lord Atkin in United Australia v Barclays Bank[7], today, when the ghost of Mallet stands in the path of a just and equitable outcome, clanking its gender biased chains, the proper course for a judge is to pass through it undeterred. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
It’s clear that Mr Waterson’s expenses claims have upset many people in Eastbourne. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:02 am
The large families problem Finally, a break of sorts for homelessness units across the land was reported on Nearly Legal – The Case of Sharif v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
However, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2006] UKHL 44 he was described by Lord Hoffmann as being “hostile to the spirit of Reynolds” and his finding in favour of the Saudi Arabian businessman was reversed, the House of Lords finding that qualified privilege did apply. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
These points lead me to agree very strongly with Lord Woolf when he says that there is a good deal of sense in more research being conducted into juries to help judges better advise jurors. [read post]
