Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 921 - 940
of 5,671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Cases like Graham v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 4:30 pm
From yesterday's U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:25 am
See Sasqua v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Labuda in People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:15 am
Patterson and Aundrell Patterson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 6:12 pm
See, e.g., Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 6:12 pm
See, e.g., Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:46 pm
Mayton v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 4:58 am
As in Bass v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:28 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
Brown, Jr. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court seemed to hold that in 1962, when it ruled in Engel v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:04 am
In strict products liability cases, manufacturers are held to be strictly liable for their products when their defective designs injure people. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:10 am
This is Part 2 of a post discussing the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:37 am
Williams v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
The Court of Appeal today gave judgment in the case of ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:38 pm
" Fourteen years ago, CJLF defended Virginia's cross-burning law as applied to a cross burned in a manner that constituted a threat to specific people, and the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
Thus, the government employees who prepared the records were “not defendant's accuser[s]' in any but the most attenuated sense”, and the breath test documents were properly admitted in evidence over defendant's objection based on the Confrontation Clause (internal citations omitted).It should be noted that some local courts have held otherwise (People v Carreira, 27 Misc3d [Watertown City Ct 2010]; People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:54 am
In People v. [read post]
