Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 921 - 940
of 16,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2009, 8:35 am
McGhee and Wood v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:21 pm
Restraining orders are legal orders that protect a person or multiple people from another person. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:05 am
In Andon, LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 5:31 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletin - find case summaries and links to source documents at:http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2014cta.htmlGatzaros v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:00 pm
’s motion should have been granted and the indictment dismissed.Was that all-time low for the People? [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 8:05 am
In Latta v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
The Supreme Court by a majority verdict in Supriyo v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:10 am
In Wolfe v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:17 am
Put simply—and this is surprising to many people—there is no constitutional guarantee of the right to vote. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 1:07 pm
At the hearing, the trial court orally grants the motion, and two minutes after the hearing ends, the plaintiff accepts the 998 offer and (a couple minutes after that) files the acceptance with the court. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:03 pm
A federal judge in Rhode Island granted a default judgment against one of the defendants for $33 million. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:55 pm
In Capitol v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:47 pm
I recently came across a fascinating Fourth Amendment decision, Frank v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:59 pm
Yes, people can lie. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 12:01 pm
But they hate terrorists.For that reason, this one may get less play in the places that typically come to mind when one thinks of reactions to Ninth Circuit opinions that grant relief from deportation. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:08 pm
Edward Griffin et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:46 am
With respect to damages, the Court reviewed the law of defamation, including available defences (citing the Supreme Court in Grant v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
Karkkainen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:11 pm
In VanDussen v Court of Appeals, the Michigan Supreme Court directed the Court of Appeals to “articulate the reason why ‘the fair administration of justice’ warrants the denial of plaintiff’s request to film oral argument on May 10, 2011” in People v Anderson, COA No. 300641, a medical marijuana case. [read post]
