Search for: "People v. Mays (1998)"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Most lay people do not understand the significance of taking an oath. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 1:01 pm
The Museum of Old and New Art’s (“MONA”) “Ladies Lounge,” a section of the museum only available to people who identify as women, is at the center of a discrimination lawsuit and a forgery controversy. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
Democratic bodies may represent the people, but they have a distinct identity which may need protecting. [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 11:41 am
Would we be in this national lose-lose situation without the Court's two Bush v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Public Interest Defense The law of confidentiality is based on the principle that people who are entrusted with confidential information ought, as a general rule, to respect it. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:01 pm
Impressa Perosa, S.R.L., 139 F.3d 98, 103 (2d Cir. 1998); Person's Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:35 am
Cir. 1998) (en banc) (concluding the factfinder may infer pretext if "a reasonable employer would have found the plaintiff to be significantly better qualified for the job"), and in this case the Court of Appeals qualified its statement by suggesting that superior qualifications may be probative of pretext when combined with other evidence[.] [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
No work of any kind may cross an exact vertical projection of this property line, above or below ground as noted in Anderson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 1:47 am
Other Kats may be having their say on this decision too ... [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
This would be a functional public authority under s6 Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) following the decision in R(A) v Partnerships in Care (2002). [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:50 am
The Korematsu v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:00 am
In Vriend v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
Introduction Common Interest Communities have become a way of life for the American people. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
Sixty-six percent of ill people were female. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 1:58 am
—————————————– [1] JM v QFG [1998] QCA 228 per Davies and Thomas JJA. [2] https://www.icmartivf.org/glossary/i-m/. [3] https://www.asrm.org/practice-guidance/practice-committee-documents/denitions-of-infertility/. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 1:58 am
—————————————– [1] JM v QFG [1998] QCA 228 per Davies and Thomas JJA. [2] https://www.icmartivf.org/glossary/i-m/. [3] https://www.asrm.org/practice-guidance/practice-committee-documents/denitions-of-infertility/. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:33 pm
In fact, may of them weren't even Lawyers yet. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:52 am
Within that point, people endlessly debated (and still debate) issues of definition (what is law?) [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
