Search for: "People v. Sample" Results 921 - 940 of 1,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2007, 8:07 pm
Attorney Daniel Alter in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Doe v. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Sandy Levinson
  After all, part of the bill of particulars, for Van Cleve and myself, is Article V itself, and its basic message of "Abandon all hope" sent to anyone bold enough to suggest the need for constitutional amendment. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Defendants argued that the studies only looked at people with arthritis, not people who only experience joint pain and stiffness, but the court had to take as true the complaint’s allegation that experts in the field deemed such studies to be appropriate proxies for non-arthritic people as well. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 12:51 pm by Lawrence Taylor
Urine tests are only used if you cannot provide either a breath or blood sample, or if the tests cannot be performed. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 6:01 pm
The sampling error for national results is +/- 2.5 percent, for Earned Wealth-Only +/-3.0 percent, and for Inherited/Other Wealth-Only +/- 10.0 percent, at the 95 percent confidence level The survey was designed and managed by HNW, Inc. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:48 pm
Moreover, we do not know what the subject selection criteria were so this sample may not have been a microcosm of the entire population. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Test methods matter: representative sampling and Clean Air Act test methods can survive EPA’s credible evidence rule. 25 J. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:05 pm by Matt Cameron
But I have to say a few things about the First Circuit’s thoughtful and eminently humane ruling in Taing v. [read post]