Search for: "People v. Sample" Results 921 - 940 of 1,949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2015, 6:20 am by Jessica C. Diamond
In a recent case, Passaic County Board of Social Services on Behalf of T.M. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
The majority, agreeing with Girvan LJ in the Divisional Court, held that the ECtHR in S and Marper v UK [2009] 48 EHRR 50 was not considering the position of convicted people [2], and confined the principles of the Strasbourg decision to the retention of data obtained from unconvicted persons. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Chicago school people would disagree b/c the choice to become informed is itself a cost that people choose to bear or not bear.) [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 8:52 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
However, there are people who have an allergy to gluten, and these people suffer from a condition known as celiac disease. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am by Tara Hofbauer
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am by Tara Hofbauer
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]