Search for: "People v. Spellings"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,014
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
A suicide bomber killed three people and wounded several others in an attack on a Saudi mosque, according to Saudi state television. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
A proper Daubert analysis would have looked to see if the expert employed a reliable methodology in trying to extrapolate from such studies to what happens in actual people taking the drug. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
(Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm
That ruling came a year after the Court, in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
In June, a gunman slaughtered 49 people in Orlando, Florida, pledging allegiance to the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in the process. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
This was spelled out quite unequivocally by the Court in C-357/19: “… compliance by a Member State with the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU is a condition for the enjoyment of all the rights deriving from the application of the Treaties to that Member State. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Enfranchisement of Indigenous people did not fully occur until 1960. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
.) ———————————— Analysis If there is a surprise in the Supreme Court’s agreement to take on the constitutional controversy over the new federal health care law, it is the Court’s willingness to rule on Congress’s power to broadly expand the right of poor people to health care benefits under the federal-state program called “Medicaid.” In that review, the Court will be… [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 12:33 pm
Frank points to Pagliolo v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
Looking to Strasbourg jurisprudence, he commented, “[t]he ECtHR will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1” if its judgment is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” (James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:59 am
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
In the '90s a million people bought that book. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 7:29 am
This needs to be spelled out. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am
A catch-all is no longer a catch-all once you spell out what it catches. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
