Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 921 - 940
of 178,315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
Defendant made no appearance whatsoever in the case until February 2022, when he appeared at the hearing on plaintiff’s motion to set a date to determine damages. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
Let's start at the top. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:05 am
Yet another court has enjoined the Department of Education from enforcing its new Title IX rules that interpret Title IX's ban on sex discrimination as including a ban on gender identity discrimination. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 3:57 am
That third party stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from the plaintiff and Chase’s negligence allowed the third party to conduct the scheme. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:51 am
” “The Court finds that here, similar to the plaintiffs in Connaughton, the third-party complaint and counterclaims fails to specify any compensable damages from PAM’ s alleged fraud. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 12:15 am
The plaintiff is arguing that Blockfi "violated" Section 22009 because it took possession and used personal property collateral. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
As discussed in the article, proof of price impact by the plaintiff to a panel of independent financial economists at the Securities and Exchange Commission in cases targeting non-financial disclosure would better ensure the presence of the causal connection between the defendant’s misstatement and the plaintiff’s harm that sits at the heart of the FOTM theory of liability. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
This case was filed before the SEC’s new cybersecurity disclosure rules were in effect (see our client update summarizing those rules), but the court’s characterization of the SEC’s claims as “impermissibly rely[ing] on hindsight and speculation” should be a helpful precedent in countering attempts by the government and private plaintiffs to second-guess good-faith cybersecurity disclosure decisions. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 3:46 pm
.) -- affirming district court’s decision that: (1) FBI conducted a reasonable search for records concerning plaintiff’s child pornography-related conviction; and (2) FBI properly withheld information pursuant to Exemptions 5, 6, 7(C), and 7(E).Louise Trauma Ctr. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 1:52 pm
Conversely, the plaintiff’s proposal allocated amounts to categories exempt from the lien, leaving $18,951.51 for the insurer. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 1:15 pm
” It further argued that the plaintiff’s alleged injuries could have been redressed with an injunction of “Section 106.31(a)(2) and Section 106.2’s definition of hostile-environment harassment as applied to gender-identity discrimination. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 10:40 am
In September 2022, the trial court granted the defendant’s cross-motion and denied the plaintiff’s motion. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 10:30 am
It went on the dismiss various of plaintiff's claims on the basis of the ministerial exception doctrine. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 9:16 am
Plaintiffs' arguments about preemption are misplaced, and therefore we need not decide today the extent of the PREP Act's preemptive effect. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
The parties have moved to seal materials submitted in connection with Plaintiff's motion for class certification…. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:36 am
Merely directing conduct at a plaintiff known to reside in the forum state is not enough for personal jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
There, I explored the efforts of Winny, one of Missouri’s many freedom suit plaintiffs, to pursue her cause amidst the so-called Missouri Crisis, the debate over whether Missouri would enter the union as a “slave state” or a “free state” that emerged when Congressman James A. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 2:24 pm
The Manchin-Barrasso Bill seeks to exploit concerns by climate advocates that delays in permitting new transmission and renewable energy will stall America’s clean energy transition. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 1:17 pm
Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal in Cline v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 1:10 pm
" As this Court has already detailed in a prior order denying defendants request for a mistrial, "editorial opinions that denounce plaintiff's case … are irrelevant and of no evidentiary value. [read post]