Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State" Results 921 - 940 of 5,844
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am by Richard Hunt
The internet is everywhere, and most e-commerce websites make products or services available everywhere in the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October  Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October  Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October  Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October  Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
No state recognizes such a sweeping right of publicity that it is subject to zero countervailing First Amendment protections. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 10:36 am by Eric Goldman
Here, Plaintiff seeks to hold Defendants liable for their “role in developing or co-developing [their] own content. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs fearful of public hostility stemming from the nature of their claim Some plaintiffs might think that their claims will appear legally or morally unjustified to the public—even if the claims are themselves legally valid—and could lead to public ridicule or shaming.[6] [d.] [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am by rainey Reitman
Along with EFF co-hosts Cindy Cohn and Danny O’Brien, Tarah also talks about how existing computer crime law can serve to terrify security researchers, rather than uplift them. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Juan C. Antúnez
This publication doesn’t address the federal tax treatment of income or property subject to the “community property” election under Alaska, Tennessee, and South Dakota state laws. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others… [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Kristian Soltes
In public Visa has downplayed concerns about the rise of RuPay, which has been supported by public lobbying from Prime Minister Narendra Modi that has included likening the use of local cards to national service. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Kristian Soltes
In public Visa has downplayed concerns about the rise of RuPay, which has been supported by public lobbying from Prime Minister Narendra Modi that has included likening the use of local cards to national service. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Today the United States asks this court to reconsider and overrule its decision in Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others… [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 3:59 pm by Marjorie Dannenfelser
(Law professor Helen Alvaré et al. note that women’s representation in professional fields, as in public service, has increased at the same time as a prolonged decline in the U.S. abortion rate.) [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others… [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[12] The June ETS primarily requires the use of personal protective equipment (“PPE”) in “all settings where any employee provides healthcare services or healthcare support services. [read post]