Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2012, 1:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
United States, 60 Ct. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:48 pm
" As stated in Alice v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 3:40 pm
One quick item to flag. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:38 am
Quick exchange of words. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 7:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 9:02 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:18 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States, as recently as this past term in Bond v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:35 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm
Although the DOJ was quick to point out that this doesn’t mean there weren’t grounds for defendant to be convicted, but federal and state prosecutors in almost every state and D.C. are being issued notifications so they can determine whether there are grounds for appeals. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:54 pm
On 7 January 2021, Facebook suspended the account of Donald Trump, President of the United States for an indefinite period. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
United States, involving how to determine what constitutes a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, for this blog. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:45 am
" CJLF has also filed an amicus curiae brief in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Fortunately, the Court made quick work of this flawed argument. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:44 pm
Cribbing now from his abstract: District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:13 am
Instead, Congress opted simply to express regret for the events of a century before.Brief of United States at 8 (emphasis original). [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
The degendering of marriage has not been attacked as a violation of the United States constitution because we understand that the marriages the states sanction today are marriage and give what is required by the Constitution (whatever that is, about which the courts have not said much). [read post]
