Search for: "REED v. STATE"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 1:51 pm
However, a September 2019 New York State intermediate appellate court decision – Vega v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Following yesterday's Supreme Court opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 9:36 am
Lifeway Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 2:14 pm
In response to the Fifth Circuit’s recent holding in Mayfield v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:36 am
He was taken to Walter Reed Hospital as soon as he arrived back in the states. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:15 am
I previously wrote that I was hoping the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:24 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:24 am
In State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:58 am
Chuck Reed, and Hon. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:05 pm
The majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 8:39 am
Reed. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:30 am
In “The Project,” Grant Woods aims to support the arts and repair a state’s image. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:40 am
” Reed v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Limited [2012] EWCA Civ 635 - granted on 24 July 2013 by Lady Hale, Lord Sumption and Lord Reed. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
FEC Overbreadth Doctrine: United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:19 am
Sentencing framework for private sector corruption involving agents In Goh Ngak Eng v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
(2) Nike v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
Given the differing traditions from which its judges are drawn, and bearing in mind that the court has not regarded the award of just satisfaction as its principal concern, it is not altogether surprising that it has generally dealt with the subject relatively briefly, and has offered little explanation of its reasons for awarding particular amounts or for declining to make an award”, per Lord Reed, Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] 2 AC 254… [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court with District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
