Search for: "ROBERT GARNER"
Results 921 - 940
of 991
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
It seems to have garnered attention through a fortuitous chain of circumstances and was soon forgotten. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 5:02 am
But Orin Kerr reminded me of a speech by Justice Robert Jackson, given when he was a mere 3 months into his tenure as Attorney General in 1940. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:57 pm
Uram (415) 774-3285 ruram@sheppardmullin.com and Keith Garner (415) 774-2991 kgarner@sheppardmullin.com Robert J. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 7:16 pm
Since it's release on Wednesday, it's received almost a million views (the Progressive Accountability one has only garnered just over a quarter of that.) [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:48 pm
Two caveats: (1) the first-mover--here, Cravath 108 years ago--garners the most benefit; (2) if a firm neglects a key element--e.g., investing in associates--the model generates no competitive advantage. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:14 am
Louis garnered their share of elite law school graduates. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:23 pm
In addition, I suspect at least a few more post-Booker issues might still garner the Justices' attention (perhaps acquitted conduct or other burden-of-proof issues). [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:18 pm
“The merger of these two great law firms continues Troutman Sanders’ strategy of expanding into new markets where we are needed by existing clients and see the potential for considerable future growth,” said Robert W. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:37 pm
"Justice Souter refused to talk to Garner (the interviewer). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:21 am
This view garnered only plurality support, getting a majority only with Justice Stevens' concurrence, which offered a different view on the rule of lenity: Under this statute the rule of lenity means proceeds=profits, but that is not true for all statutes. [read post]
30 May 2008, 2:29 pm
Isn't it nice to know that Robert Jackson - at least someone on the Court - saw how horrible it was? [read post]
19 May 2008, 4:22 pm
View the article here05/19/2008by Jennifer EvrardThe trial of Robert Sylvester Kelly, a.k.a. the Pied Piper of R&B, aka the King of R&B, a.k.a. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:29 am
Rev. 1281 (1976). 7 609 Robert H. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 12:52 pm
In 1998, the court revoked his probation and sent him back to prison to finish the rest of his sentence.Officials weigh inMorgan County Sheriff Robert Garner and acting Morgan County Prosecutor Robert Cline both declined to comment of the matter since it is a pending suit. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:52 pm
On April 10, 2008, the Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") and the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") issued a final rule governing mitigation requirements for unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other waters of the United States under the section 404 program of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:55 am
"We ... agree that petitioners have not carried their burden of showing that the risk of pain from maladministration of a concededly humane lethal injection protocol, and the failure to adopt untried and untested alternatives, constitute cruel and unusual punishment," Chief Justice John Roberts said in an opinion that garnered only three votes. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
If there is the political will to make a treaty self-executing, there will almost always be the political will to enact implementing legislation that renders the self-execution question moot: It's a very rare law that can garner support of 2/3 of the Senate (required for treaty ratification) but can't also get a majority of the House.Still, there is a real difference here. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 11:11 am
Another tip that Chief Justice Roberts shares with Bryan Garner is a great method to prepare for questions from a judge who is not as familiar with the legal area as you are. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 9:03 pm
Robert S. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
Robert Welch, Inc. recognized private individuals are more vulnerable to injury than public officials, especially considering public officials have larger channels of communication than private individuals, the Court recognized that many private individuals attract attention and comment.[13] Following the Supreme Court's lead, a number of other courts have recognized restaurants as public figures.[14] Thus, a restaurant bringing a defamation suit against a critic would have to prove… [read post]
