Search for: "Read v. People" Results 921 - 940 of 21,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm by Mark Movsesian
In Groff, the Court ruled unanimously that the de minimis standard is not the correct reading of Title VII. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
" You can read the whole thing for yourself if you'd like, but here's the most depressing/disturbing part -- the part that made me speak to myself out loud. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 5:58 am by Liisa Speaker
However, the Trial Court, citing People v Messenger, 221 Mich App 171, 176; 561 NW2d 463 (1997), concluded that no mistrial was necessary after conducting voir dire with the jury and confirming they could purge what they had read and strictly follow the court’s instructions. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 5:46 am
Here is a link to the announcement: Starting today, we're enabling people everywhere to find and read full text legal opinions from U.S. federal and state district, appellate and supreme courts using Google Scholar. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 11:34 am
With contributions from leading authors - including Dr Kong Xiangjun, President of the Intellectual Property Tribunal at the Supreme People’s Court of China - this book is the first comprehensive response to a highly controversial and largely under-developed field of inquiry. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 12:09 pm by Donna Eng
  As a Florida criminal appeals attorney, I was saddened to read, on page 45, that Florida stands out as the State that has the highest number of people sentenced to life without parole for non-homicide crimes committed while the people were juveniles. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The violation is complete when sales below cost are made with the requisite intent and not within any of the exceptions.' (People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
He stopped towards the end and started reading more carefully. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by INFORRM
 The fact that two items of personal information printed about him in the article were true would have added fuel to the suspicion of anyone who knew him and read the article. [read post]