Search for: "Reiter v Reiter" Results 921 - 940 of 6,282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In so ruling, the Second Circuit reiterated that the plaintiff rather than the defendant in a trademark infringement claim bears the burden of proving the likelihood of consumer confusion, and that no particular order of analysis is required as long as the court considers all appropriate factors (Hamilton International Ltd. v. [read post]
In so ruling, the Second Circuit reiterated that the plaintiff rather than the defendant in a trademark infringement claim bears the burden of proving the likelihood of consumer confusion, and that no particular order of analysis is required as long as the court considers all appropriate factors (Hamilton International Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 11:20 am by Pamela Wolf
The appeals court determined that the employee had engaged in protected activity and district court found fact disputes prohibiting summary judgment on the remaining aspects of his retaliation claim (Kengerski v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 11:20 am by Pamela Wolf
The appeals court determined that the employee had engaged in protected activity and district court found fact disputes prohibiting summary judgment on the remaining aspects of his retaliation claim (Kengerski v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm by JURIST Staff
Reiterating its stance, the Solicitor General on Monday submitted that the 2018 decision in Navtej Singh Johar v. [read post]
 So we reiterate our call to Congress to pass legislation to restore the ability of the FTC to seek monetary remedies under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act in appropriate circumstances. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am by Robert Loeb, Cesar Lopez-Morales
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:09 am by Amina Yuda
The determination reiterates that trustees of a pension fund have a fiduciary duty towards the fund and its members and, in exercising their duties, they are required to scrutinise the reasons for withholding of claims and carefully balance the financial prejudice of its members against the employer’s claim. [read post]