Search for: "Roberts v. U.s" Results 921 - 940 of 10,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
In the dilemma that he dare not remain in his home, or voluntarily leave the area, without incurring criminal penalties, and that the only way he could avoid punishment was to go to an Assembly Center and submit himself to military imprisonment, the petitioner did nothing. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that, had the petitioner attempted to violate Proclamation No. 4 and leave the military area in which he lived, he would have been arrested and tried and convicted for violation of Proclamation No. 4. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that, had the petitioner attempted to violate Proclamation No. 4 and leave the military area in which he lived, he would have been arrested and tried and convicted for violation of Proclamation No. 4. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
In the dilemma that he dare not remain in his home, or voluntarily leave the area, without incurring criminal penalties, and that the only way he could avoid punishment was to go to an Assembly Center and submit himself to military imprisonment, the petitioner did nothing. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Howard Friedman
The court concluded that the action taken against the inmate was merely de minimis adverse action.In Roberts v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am by Kristin E. Hickman
That doctrine interprets Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:10 am
Nothing surprising there.But unlike the usual case, where Kennedy's the swing vote, this time the swing vote that adds the fifth vote to the four conservatives (Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito) is . . . . [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 2:28 am by Andrew Trask
In denying certiorari in Marek v Lane, Chief Justice Roberts took the time to issue an accompanying opinion. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
Washington (541 U.S. 36 [2004]), overruled its prior holding in Ohio v Roberts ( 41 U.S. 36 [2004]) that reliability of hearsay evidence is the test for admissibility, and held that "Where testimonial evidence is at issue, however, the Sixth Amendment demands what the common law required: unavailability and a prior opportunity for cross-examination…. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 11:20 am by Neil Siegel
Supreme Court, Robert Cooter of UC Berkeley Law School and I developed a theory of Congress's taxing power that anticipated, and may have influenced, the Court's taxing power analysis in NFIB v. [read post]