Search for: "Russell v. Post"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The post Tuesday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 11:17 am
” People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
The Illinois divorce process is very regimented. [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:06 am
” Carnes v. [read post]
5 Jun 2021, 6:16 am
“[R]ehabilitative maintenance, as opposed to permanent maintenance, is intended to provide the spouse with an opportunity to adjust to nonmarital life and provide [himself or] herself with independent means of support)” Blum v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
The Illinois divorce process is very regimented. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 8:24 am
” People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 5:03 am
” Miller v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm
“C” equals the gross amount of: (i) the member’s monthly retirement benefit (Section III(A)) calculated as of the member’s effective date of retirement (check only one) including not including other permissive service, upgrades purchased, and other benefit formula enhancements; (ii) the member’s refund payable upon termination or lump sum retirement benefit that becomes payable, including any payable interest (Section V(A)) calculated as of the time said refund… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:35 am
The post Monday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., then known as Thomas C. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 3:24 pm
Resendiz-Ponce and Russell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
First up is Bucklew v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am
Commentary on yesterday’s decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
[Note: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, served as counsel to the respondents in the case, but the author of this post was not involved in the case.] [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Perry; the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Georgia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Omnicare. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Heffernan v. [read post]
