Search for: "SHARP v. UNITED STATES"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2013, 5:30 am
ERISA preemption of severance agreements ARSENIO COLORADO, ET AL. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 11:55 am
In Jesinoski v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:01 am
Attorney in the case of United States v Samuel Mullet, et al, charged members of a peculiar Amish synod with hate crimes; charges that involve far more complex proofs.About two-years ago, ole Samuel Mullet [you cannot make it up] broke away from the traditional fundamentalist Christian Amish church in which he was raised, to start a renegade sect of his own in Bergholz, Ohio. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm
Policy in MIGHT V. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 4:08 am
In the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s momentous decision in Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:27 pm
United States, in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not commandeer state officials to enforce federal law. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Czech Republic Czech Arbitration Court wants to speed up UDRP process (Managing Intellectual Property) Finland Finland, Spain bringing 1Mbps broadband to everyone (Ars Technica) Germany More on IPCom and its litigation with HTC in Germany (IAM) India Google Book settlement – Indian government protests... finally (Spicy IP) Cybersquatting gets sharp rap from INDRP Arbitration: Bloomberg finance wins (Spicy IP) Sweden Swedish internet traffic recovers after… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 473 (1982). [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court ruling [in Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
United States, 51 F.4th 1289, 1293 (11th Cir. 2022))). [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 9:02 am
United States (E.D. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:13 am
§ 4072 to be more than just a statute of limitations; it is a condition precedent to the United States’ waiver of sovereign immunity. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
Is this, asks Merpel, the first time an appeal in any IP proceedings in the United Kingdom has been dealt with by a predominantly female tribunal? [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:02 pm
Koh's upcoming FTC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm
Five years later, in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
The court referred to Perez v. [read post]
